Saturday, December 28, 2019
Comp230 Week 6 Ip File Report Essay - 1325 Words
VBScript IP File Report In the space provided below, copy and paste your IP_FileWrite.vbs program sourcecode. If it doesnââ¬â¢t fit, use the next page for the continuation of your program sourcecode. VBScript: IP_FileWrite.vbs Written by: Date: Class: Professor: =================================== This initializes a 2-dimension array of IP Address. The first index +100 is the room# and the second index+1 is the computer# in the room. dim ipAddress(5,3) ipAddress(0,0)=192.168.10.11 ipAddress(0,1)=192.168.10.12 ipAddress(0,2)=192.168.10.13 ipAddress(0,3)=192.168.10.14 ipAddress(1,0)=192.168.10.19 ipAddress(1,1)=192.168.10.20 ipAddress(1,2)=192.168.10.21â⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦If fso.FileExists(fileName) Then wscript.echo else wscript.echo(chr(7) chr(7) File Does Not Exist!!! vbCrLf) wscript.echo(You Must Create the File Before You can Read the File !!) WScript.Quit End If In the space provided below to copy and paste the remainder of your IP_AppendRead.vbs sourcecode if it did not fit in the first textbox. Set file object Set ipAddrFile = fso.OpenTextFile(fileName,APPEND,ASCII) Append and close file For room = 6 to 6 For computer = 4 to 4 ipAddrStr = _ CStr(newroom) ,1, CStr(comp1_IP) vbCrLf _ CStr(newroom) ,2, CStr(comp2_IP) vbCrLf _ CStr(newroom) ,3, CStr(comp3_IP) vbCrLf _ CStr(newroom) ,4, CStr(comp4_IP) vbCrLf _ ipAddrFile.Write(ipAddrStr) Next Next ipAddrFile.Close Open appended file, display contents, and close file. Set ipAddrFile = fso.OpenTextFile(fileName,READ,ASCII) Do Until ipAddrFile.AtEndOfStream = True room = ipAddrFile.Read(3) ipAddrStr = ipAddrFile.Skip(1) computer = ipAddrFile.Read(1) ipAddrStr = ipAddrFile.Skip(1) ipAddress = ipAddrFile.Read(13) ipAddrStr = ipAddrFile.SkipLine() wscript.echo(The IP Address in Room room for Computer computer is ipAddress) Loop ipAddrFile.Close In the space provided below, copy and paste the RUN of your
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Containment Early Cold war Essay - 1996 Words
Containment Early Cold war In the early years of the Cold War, both the Truman and Eisenhower administrations pursued a policy of containment to counter perceived Soviet aggression. Generally, the presidential administrations pursued this policy to maintain stability in the international arena, to maintain a balance of power, and also in a sense, to express disapproval of totalitarian, non-democratic regimes. Containment was expressed through a variety of policies and institutions: economic, political and, of course, military. The ways the early presidential administrations defined and implemented containment strategy inevitably changed in focus, importance, and emphasis over time. While both external and internal reasons accounted toâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Nonetheless, Eisenhower saw an emphasis on trade as advantageous to America, even in the short term. Also, Eisenhower did not accept government economic intervention on a more ideological level -- he considered government planned economies too much l ike socialism. Secondly, the administrations pursued different military strategies. Truman made more of a distinction between nuclear and conventional warfare. He saw that conventional warfare as a more plausible answer to peripheral containment, and clearly valued a strong conventional military. Eisenhower, for economic reasons, was less inclined to spend an exorbitant amount of money on conventional armies across the globe. He succeeded in blurring line between nuclear and conventional warfare and encouraged the idea that he was ready to use nuclear weapons at any time. The Truman administration was more influenced by balance of power considerations than any other considerations, including domestic politics. Because of the external threats to the United States between 1947-1953, it was inevitable that these policies would have been pursued. Most significantly, Stalin at this point was perceived by the Western powers as having expansionist tendencies. Truman saw the Soviets as highly motivated to dominate the world, and committed to aggressively exploiting all opportunities to enlarge their sphere of influence. Considering the context of Trumanââ¬â¢s post-W.W.IIShow MoreRelatedThe Cold War Era During World War II1349 Words à |à 6 PagesThe Cold War Era that followed the end of World War II was unlike any Americans had seen before. After defeating Germany and its allies in the war, the United States faced a change on the home front: young Americans rushed into marriage and parenthood in unprecedented numbers. In Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era, Elaine Tyler May describes these changes from the end of the war through the early 1960s. The author makes a compelling range of arguments about the changes that affectedRead MoreThe Cold War: A New History by John Lewis Gaddis831 Words à |à 4 Pageshistory was analyzed. The Cold War is rampant with American foreign policy and influential in shaping the modern world. Strategies of Containment outlines American policy from the end of World War II until present day. Gaddis outlines the policies of presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, including policies influenced by others such as George Kennan, John Dulles, and Henry Kissinger. The author, John Lewis Gaddis has written many books on the Cold War and is an avid researcherRead MoreTaking a Look at the Cold War1237 Words à |à 5 Pagescovering is the Cold War and question number six. The Roosevelt Administration was determined to avoid a retreat like the one that followed WWI. The Unite d States itself had sole possession of the atomic bomb. The United States goal was to expand democracy. America saw that there needed to be global economic reconstruction. The Soviets looked to model the rest of the world after their own values and origins. It indeed had to do with Soviet Expansion. The Russians didnââ¬â¢t want to go to war with the UnitedRead MoreThe Cold War And The Soviet War845 Words à |à 4 PagesThe reason the Cold War was called the Cold War is because there were no physical battles with weapons, tanks, or even artillery, it was a war between capitalism vs. communism, democracy vs. dictatorship. This War actually started when Stalin of the USSR had a conference during the end of WWII who promised the American president, FDR, that he would allow there to be elections, democratic elections, in the Eastern part of Europe which had the soviet dominance. But in the year of 1945, in the PotsdamRead MoreThe War And The Spanish Civil War987 Words à |à 4 Pa gesBoth conflicts show that civil war was not the limit of the atrocities people were willing to commit in order to stop the influence of opposing ideologies. In both the Cold War and the Spanish Civil War the most significant air operations were carried in order to stop the spread of Communism. One of the factors that prompted the U.S. into dropping the atomic bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima was to stop the war in Japan as soon as possible. Many of Trumanââ¬â¢s advisers, such as James F. Byrnes supportedRead MoreThe 70s Are Not Totally Happy `` Days1667 Words à |à 7 PagesThe 50s are not totally ââ¬Å" happyâ⬠days. In American history the post war 1950s, was a unforgettable era. T.V. shows were made, showing early childhood experiences in 1950s. For example, some shows such as LEAVE IT TO BEAVER and FATHER KNOWS BEST. These shows leave viewers with historical facts from the past. Not everyone was happy, a group of civilians and nonconformists pointed out the flaws in a suburb they believed had no moral, a government that was growing viciously with power. A lifestyleRead MoreContainment: The American Way1372 Words à |à 6 Pagescommitment to fight communism after World War II everywhere it could in the world and got involved in conflicts more because of self-interest and determination to beat communism than the cause. This first appears with the Truman Doctrine, which set the precedent for America to assist anti-communist regimes around the world. After World War II and up until the early 1990ââ¬â¢s the foreign policy of the United States was based on the policy of the containment of Cold War ideology and to prevent nations fromRead MoreUnited States Containment Policy During the Cold War1003 Words à |à 5 PagesDuring the Cold War, Americas basic policy was that of containment of the Soviet Union. The policy of containment was based upon several principles. First, the Soviet Union wanted to spread socialism to all areas of the world. H owever, it was felt that the leadership of the Soviet Union felt no particular rush to accomplish their goal. The Kremlin is under no ideological compulsion to accomplish its purposes in a hurry. Like the Church, it is dealing in ideological concepts which are ofRead MoreThe Sources of Soviet Conduct by George F. Kennan Essay694 Words à |à 3 Pages Kennanââ¬â¢s philosophy behind stopping Communism from spreading was through containment, even though the telegraph did not have the word containment in it. The Truman Doctrine was established and the number of Presidents that viewed war in foreign soil. Kennan continued to fight Communism and had inputs and theories on other conflicts to include Vietnam and Korea. George Kennan was an observer of the Russian Civil War aftermath. Kennan served as a Soviet front for two years in Moscow as chiefRead MoreUnited States Containment Policy During The Cold War Essay1023 Words à |à 5 PagesDuring the Cold War, Americas basic policy was that of containment of the Soviet Union. The policy of containment was based upon several principles. First, the Soviet Union wanted to spread socialism to all areas of the world. However, it was felt that the leadership of the Soviet Union felt no particular rush to accomplish their goal. The Kremlin is under no ideological compulsion to accomplish its purposes in a hurry. Like the Church, it is dealing in ideological concepts which are of
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Business Ethics Focusing - Refining - and Aligning
Question: Discuss about a Report on Business Ethics: Focusing, Refining, and Aligning? Answer: Influence of the ethical considerations on the objectives of the Pfizer Pfizer group is one of the leading names in the pharmaceuticals sector and this company is operating on the global floors and is well renounced among the medical sector due to the innovations which are being made by this organization in the field of introducing medicines of the number of critical diseases. The mission of the business is to attain a sustainable business structure for the longer run and help the society to live a better and healthy life and also by the way of help curing diseases like cancer (Bsr.org, 2015). Moreover, they are also striving to produce medicines which would provide the healing and curing effect more and to reduce the rate of side effects by having the medicines. Therefore, their main ethical concern is to help the society to the lead a better life and assist the medical team to treat the patients or the service users in the most effective manner. At the same time, by the way of providing more useful medicines this is considered to be one of the core cor porate objectives of the business to be a leader in the segment of pharmaceutical sector in the world. Evaluation of the implications for Pfizer and their stakeholders to operate ethically Pfizer group are trying to meet with the ethical considerations of the business in the effective manner. Therefore, for the purpose to meet with the ethical considerations the team is making use of the technological advancements and also with the help of efficient expertise research them the business is trying to produce the medicines which would be even effective to cure disease like cancer. The entire team of the business the employees and the managerial employees form the core stakeholders of the business and with the help of following the ethical measures the team would be able to operate responsibly and ethically (Wieland, 2001). Current ethical issue of Shell Shell has been reported as one of the well- known business not only for its leadership in the production of gas and oil sector but also when it comes to meet with the ethical factor. This has also been reported in the sustainability report of the business that the management of Shell group is continuously striving to meet with the ethical factor so of the business so as to make the business all the more sustainable in nature and help the business grow by meeting with the environmental measures (misebogland, 2013). However, the Irish Corrib alcohol bribery corruption scandal questioned the ethical concern of the business and the after the case was being highlighted the Shell group to measures to hide whatever was ongoing at that time. This has questioned the approach of the business and also their commitment towards operating the business in the responsible manner and their responsibility towards the society and safeguarding the environmental factors. Ethical issue that Shell need to address This is evident from the current case of Corrib gas project undertaken by Shell that they have not been able to meet with the ethical consideration and also their commitment towards reducing the environmental pollutions and conducting the business operations in the responsible manner. This is mentioned in their sustainability report that the business operations are being conducted in the responsible manner and they are also trying to meet with the measures so as to reduce the environment pollution and also the application of CCS technologies by the business to reduce the rate of environment pollution (Balch, 2014). Moreover, they are also trying to imbibe the ethical considerations of the business in their employees for the effective implementations of the ethical measures. Despite of all such measures the business has not been able to meet with their commitment as reflected form the considered case of scandal. Thus, this would be desired for the entire group to meet with the environ ment pollution measures more effectively. Suitable ethical codes of Shell This would be preferable for the entire group to consider more strict measures for the purpose to reduce the rate of environment pollutions and also to set a controlling team that would further act as the guide for the business towards their ethical venture of conducting the business operations. The team would be monitoring the move of the employees of the business also of the management towards the research projects with respect to its effect on the environment and the society on the whole (Vogel, 1991). References Balch, O. (2014). Shell is pushed to explain its role in $1.1bn Nigerian corruption scandal. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/shell-nigeria-oil-payment-corruption-scandal [Accessed 5 Jun. 2015]. Bsr.org, (2015). Pfizer: Focusing, Refining, and Aligning CSR with a New Strategy | Case Studies | BSR. [online] Available at: https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/case-study-view/pfizer-focusing-refining-and-aligning-csr-with-a-new-strategy [Accessed 5 Jun. 2015]. misebogland, (2013). New revelations in Shell Corrib Gas Corruption Scandal. [online] Available at: https://misebogland.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/new-revelations-in-shell-corrib-gas-corruption-scandal/ [Accessed 5 Jun. 2015]. Vogel, D. (1991). The Ethical Roots of Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), p.101. Wieland, J. (2001). The Ethics of Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), p.73.
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Stem Cell Research is Bad an Example of the Topic Education and science by
Stem Cell Research is Bad Stem Cell Research is Bad and Should Not Be Done Stem cell research is conducted in order to obtain advanced knowledge on how an organism will develop from one cell and how healthy cells can be used to replace damaged cells in an adult. Stem cell research has paved the way for scientists to conduct investigations on the likelihood of cell-based therapies in the treatment of diseases, which is often called regenerative or reparative medicine (National Institutes of Health [NIH] 2). Need essay sample on "Stem Cell Research is Bad" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed Students Frequently Tell Us: How much do I have to pay someone to make my essay in time? Specialists suggest: Choose The Qualified Help In Writing Papers Top Essay Writing Company Professional Writers For Hire Best Essay Writing Service Best Student Essay Writing Company Despite the belief that it can be useful in saving many lives, stem cell research is bad and should not be done because there has been no findings yet about its effectivity in treating certain diseases. Stem Cell Research Concepts, Issues, And Origin Before explaining the negative implications of stem cell research, it is important to understand first the concepts and issues involved in this field of study as well as its origin. First of all, there are two important attributes of stem cells that set them apart from other kinds of cells. First, they have the capacity to rejuvenate themselves for extended periods through the process of cell pision because of their nature as unspecialized cells. Second, by placing them under certain physiologic or experimental circumstances, stem cells can be transformed to become cells with specialized functions such as the beating of the heart muscle or producing insulin for the pancreas (NIH 2). Generally, scientists utilize two types of stem cells from animals and humans: embryonic and adult stem cells, which have varying functions and qualities. There are various reasons why stem cells are deemed important to human beings. In a blastocyst (a 3-5 day old embryo), for example, they are helpful in the development of several specialized kinds of cells that constitute the heart, skin, lung, and other tissues. In the tissues of some adults, stem cells help in the generation of replacements for cells that are damaged because of wear and tear, injury, or diseases (NIH 3). During the latter portion of the 1990s, scientists found out many attributes of stem cells. According to investigations, even the mature stem cell from a single tissue is enough to produce cells of another tissue variety, such as neurons for the brain. A research conducted by Fred Gage at the Salks Institute for Biological Studies shows that the brains of human adults can produce new neurons. Prior to Gages findings, scientists assumed that the human brain does not have the capacity to produce new cells after birth (Stem Cell). In 1981, the first cultures of stem cells were cultivated by scientists from mice embryos. Although the experiment spearheaded extensive research, developing human stem cells remained an elusive goal until 1998 (American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]). Nevertheless, it was on November 1998 that the isolation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) was first discovered by Dr. James Thomson, a biologist at the University of Wisconsin. hESCs can be used in the differentiation of any kind of human cell, which can range from blood to skin cells. For scientists, they were aiming to utilize them in repairing damaged tissues (AAAS). However, the work of Dr. Thomson was not qualified for funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) because of an existing ban on human embryo research. Congress placed a prohibition for funding on such kind of research. The bill, authored by Rep. Jay Dickey, disallowed funding for research on hESCs until 2001 (AAAS). Due to the great promise of Dr. Thomsons findings, the NIH sought legal help from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) concerning the ban to hESC. In 1999, the HHS reached the conclusion that public funds can be used on hESC on the premise that derivation of the cells would be conducted with private funds (AAAS). On August 9, 2001, President George W. Bush granted Federal funding on hESC research on the condition that the cells that will be used will be those that currently exist. President Bush allowed funding for such because the destruction of an embryo had already occurred. He did not permit the disbursement of public funds on future cell lines in order that they would not act in such a way that it would promote the destruction of human embryos (AAAS). On May 24, 2005, the United States House of Representative passed House Resolution 810 entitled Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act by a vote of 238 in favor of the bill against 194 opposing the bill. Ninety three percent of Democrats supported the bill while 79% rejected the bill (White, Text of H.R. 810). Two days later on May 26, 2005, the Senate voted 63 to 37. However, President George W. Bush vetoed it on July 2006 based on ideological and religious grounds. If the Stem Cell Research Enactment Act had been approved by Bush, it would have provided Federal funding for the conduct of stem cell research. However, in other countries, such as South Korea, Great Britain, Germany, Japan, and India, stem cell research is already being conducted (White, Text of H.R. 810). Arguments Against Stem Cell Research The issue of stem cell research has been met with both support and criticism. Here are some of the arguments against stem cell research: Human Life Begins at Conception. One of the basic arguments is the fact that an embryo is already considered a human being because during fertilization, an egg has the potential of becoming a full-grown adult. This is in compliance with the assertion that human life begins during conception. Another issue in question when it comes to this argument is viability, which is defined as the ability of a fetus to potentially live outside the womb of the mother, albeit with artificial assistance (GE Team). Instead of pursuing embryonic stem cell research, alternatives should be considered. Research conducted by pro-life supporters claims that using adult stem cell for research is more promising instead of the embryonic stem cells. Critics of using embryonic stem cell research argued that it has no practical treatment (GE Team). Scientific errors in conducting an embryonic stem cell research Utilizing embryonic stem cell in therapies may contain fundamental flaws. For example, it was determined in one study that embryonic stem cells applied to therapeutic cloning may still be prone to immune rejection. On the other hand, there have been indications that adult stem cells can be successfully reintegrated into an autogenic animal. Likewise, embryonic stem cells have the tendency to create tumors (GE Team). Exaggeration Of Research Potential Scientists have vowed promising results from using embryonic stem cell research, and so far, this has not yet happened. In fact, majority of the criticisms have been made by the researchers themselves. The past president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science Lord Winston has even issued a warning that there is a potential backlash against stem cell research (GE Team). Even the late Pope John Paul II was very much against embryonic stem cell research. According to the late Pontiff, man must learn from previous experience which showed the negative effects of destruction of human life through acts such as euthanasia and infanticide (The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research). In addition, many ethicists and scientists are likewise against embryonic stem cell research. In a statement issued on July 1999, a group composed of bioethicists, legal scholars, and scientists stated their objection against stem cell research because they were against human ethics and is unnecessary (The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research). Another major argument by opponents of stem cell research is that there has been little attention given to adult stem research which has proven successful in the treatment of various diseases. Likewise, the opponents of embryonic stem cell research claims that therapeutic approach using stem cells have no proven cure yet (White, Pros ). Likewise, opponents of the stem cell research have instead pushed for funding adult stem cell research in order to get around the moral issues surrounding the use of human embryos (White, Pros ). Conclusion Stem cell research is a method of using human embryos in producing new cells as well as in replacing damaged cells. The method was discovered in 1998 by Dr. James Thompson. However, he could not proceed further because such kind of undertaking was not given Federal funding. One of the main arguments against stem cell research is that using a human embryo for research can destroy the life of the unborn infant already conceived in the fertilized egg. Another negative argument about stem cell research is that it has yet to produce conclusive evidence of being an effective cure. Opponents of stem cell research is instead pushing for an adult stem cell research which has already a proven record of effectivity. House Bill 810 or the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act was approved in both Houses of Congress but was vetoed by President George Bush for ideological and ethical issues. Works Cited American Association for the Advancement of Science. AAAS Policy Brief: Stem Cell Research. AAAS Center for Science, Technology and Congress. 2007 December 14. 19 August 2008 GE Team. Arguments Against Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Genetic Engineering. 2008. 19 August 2008 http://www.bootstrike.com/Genetics/StemCells/arguments_against.html> Stem Cell. Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia. 2008. 19 August 2008. National Institutes of Health. Stem Cell Basics. Stem Cell Information. 2008. 19 August 2008 The Cases For and Against Stem Cell Research. Fox News. 9 August 2001. 18 August 2008. White, Deborah. Pros About.com. 2008. 19 August 2008. White, Deborah. Text of H.R. 810: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 Passed by Congress, Vetoed by President Bush. About.com. 20 March 2007. 19 August 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)